{"id":75361,"date":"2021-01-29T22:59:20","date_gmt":"2021-01-29T14:59:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=167090"},"modified":"2021-01-29T22:59:20","modified_gmt":"2021-01-29T14:59:20","slug":"johnson-and-johnsons-single-dose-coronavirus-vaccine-66-per-cent-effective-overall-study","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/01\/29\/johnson-and-johnsons-single-dose-coronavirus-vaccine-66-per-cent-effective-overall-study\/","title":{"rendered":"Johnson and Johnson\u2019s single-dose coronavirus vaccine 66 per cent effective overall: study"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> The vaccine worked better in the US \u2013 72 per cent effective against moderate to severe Covid-19 \u2013 compared to 57 per cent in South Africa <\/p>\n<p> The company said within a week, it will file an application for emergency use in America, and then abroad <\/p>\n<p> The vaccine worked better in the US \u2013 72 per cent effective against moderate to severe Covid-19 \u2013 compared to 57 per cent in South Africa.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>The post <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/data-news\/2021\/01\/29\/johnson-and-johnsons-single-dose-coronavirus-vaccine-66-per-cent-effective-overall-study-south-china-morning-post\/\">Johnson and Johnson\u2019s single-dose coronavirus vaccine 66 per cent effective overall: study <\/a> appeared first on <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\">ChinaPulse.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The vaccine worked better in the US \u2013 72 per cent effective against moderate to severe Covid-19 \u2013 compared to 57 per cent in South Africa<br \/>\n The company said within a week, it will file an application for emergency use in America, and then abroad<br \/>\n The&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1380,144,213,288,194,494,484,1367],"tags":[2210,2636,8493,10323,10324,3610,3942,3836,2486,1859,2487,3402,7035],"class_list":["post-75361","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-africa","category-china","category-china-news","category-medicine","category-news-chinese-law","category-pharmaceutical","category-united-states","category-usa","tag-america","tag-brazil","tag-britain","tag-coronavirus","tag-covid-19","tag-diplomacy","tag-europe","tag-logistics","tag-mexico","tag-singapore","tag-south-africa","tag-united-kingdom","tag-vaccine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75361"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75361"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75361\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":75362,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75361\/revisions\/75362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75361"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75361"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75361"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}