{"id":78580,"date":"2021-02-12T21:34:00","date_gmt":"2021-02-12T13:34:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=174189"},"modified":"2021-02-12T21:34:00","modified_gmt":"2021-02-12T13:34:00","slug":"amid-oppn-claims-govt-says-not-conceded-any-indian-territory-as-result-of-agreement-with-china","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/02\/12\/amid-oppn-claims-govt-says-not-conceded-any-indian-territory-as-result-of-agreement-with-china\/","title":{"rendered":"Amid Oppn Claims, Govt Says Not Conceded Any Indian Territory as Result of Agreement with China"},"content":{"rendered":"

India on Friday said it has not conceded any territory as a result of the agreement finalised with China for disengagement of troops in Pangong lake areas in eastern Ladakh. Hours after Congress leader Rahul Gandhi alleged that the government has “ceded” Indian territory to the Chinese and raised questions over the agreement, the Ministry of Defence issued a strongly-worded statement, saying the effective safeguarding of country’s national interest and territory in the Eastern Ladakh sector has taken place because the government reposed full faith in the capabilities of the armed forces.…<\/p>\n

The post Amid Oppn Claims, Govt Says Not Conceded Any Indian Territory as Result of Agreement with China<\/a> appeared first on ChinaPulse.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

India on Friday said it has not conceded any territory as a result of the agreement finalised with China for disengagement of troops in Pangong lake areas in eastern Ladakh. Hours after Congress leader Rahul Gandhi alleged that the government has &#822…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[669,144,213,931,194,465],"tags":[3472,1696,3450,10353,2240],"class_list":["post-78580","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bank","category-china","category-china-news","category-india","category-news-chinese-law","category-social-media","tag-chinese","tag-congress","tag-indian","tag-ladakh","tag-military"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78580","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78580"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78580\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":78581,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78580\/revisions\/78581"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78580"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78580"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78580"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}