{"id":79790,"date":"2021-02-18T22:59:17","date_gmt":"2021-02-18T14:59:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=176643"},"modified":"2021-02-18T22:59:17","modified_gmt":"2021-02-18T14:59:17","slug":"us-economy-will-lose-billions-due-to-anti-china-policy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/02\/18\/us-economy-will-lose-billions-due-to-anti-china-policy\/","title":{"rendered":"US economy will lose billions due to anti-China policy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>US economy will lose billions due to anti-China policy 18.02.2021 16:36 Share  U.S. companies and the economy as a whole would lose hundreds of billions of dollars if investment in China is halved or if a new round of reciprocal customs duty increases This is said in a study by the U.S.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>US economy will lose billions due to anti-China policy 18.02.2021 16:36 Share  U.S. companies and the economy as a whole would lose hundreds of billions of dollars if investment in China is halved or if a new round of reciprocal customs duty increases &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,213,586,477,194],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-79790","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china","category-china-news","category-economy","category-investment","category-news-chinese-law"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79790","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=79790"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79790\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":79791,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79790\/revisions\/79791"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=79790"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=79790"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=79790"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}