{"id":80198,"date":"2021-02-21T16:38:00","date_gmt":"2021-02-21T08:38:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=177910"},"modified":"2021-02-21T16:38:00","modified_gmt":"2021-02-21T08:38:00","slug":"india-china-10th-round-of-the-military-talks-last-for-around-16-hours","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/02\/21\/india-china-10th-round-of-the-military-talks-last-for-around-16-hours\/","title":{"rendered":"India-China: 10th round of the military talks last for around 16 hours"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>India-China: 10th round of the military talks last for around 16 hours Updated : February 21, 2021 12:08 PM IST Last year, the Chinese military built several bunkers and other structures in the areas between Finger 4 and 8 and had blocked all Indian patrols beyond Finger 4, triggering a strong reaction from the Indian Army.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>India-China: 10th round of the military talks last for around 16 hours Updated : February 21, 2021 12:08 PM IST Last year, the Chinese military built several bunkers and other structures in the areas between Finger 4 and 8 and had blocked all Indian pa&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[669,144,213,931,194],"tags":[10355,3472,3610,3450,10353,2240,6609],"class_list":["post-80198","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bank","category-china","category-china-news","category-india","category-news-chinese-law","tag-army","tag-chinese","tag-diplomacy","tag-indian","tag-ladakh","tag-military","tag-pla"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=80198"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80198\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":80199,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80198\/revisions\/80199"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=80198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=80198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=80198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}