{"id":80721,"date":"2021-02-24T22:59:01","date_gmt":"2021-02-24T14:59:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=179487"},"modified":"2021-02-24T22:59:01","modified_gmt":"2021-02-24T14:59:01","slug":"china-says-japan-us-security-treaty-a-product-of-cold-war","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/02\/24\/china-says-japan-us-security-treaty-a-product-of-cold-war\/","title":{"rendered":"China says Japan-US security treaty a product of Cold War"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>More<\/p>\n<p>By ASSOCIATED PRESS Published: February 24, 2021<\/p>\n<p>BEIJING \u2014 China on Wednesday called the Japan-U.S. mutual security pact a product of the Cold War following U.S. criticism of the presence of Chinese coast guard vessels in Japanese-claimed territorial waters over the weekend.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>More<br \/>\nBy ASSOCIATED PRESS Published: February 24, 2021<br \/>\nBEIJING \u2014 China on Wednesday called the Japan-U.S. mutual security pact a product of the Cold War following U.S. criticism of the presence of Chinese coast guard vessels in Japanese-claimed territor&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,144,213,693,194],"tags":[3472,2240,10349,10351],"class_list":["post-80721","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beijing","category-china","category-china-news","category-japan","category-news-chinese-law","tag-chinese","tag-military","tag-peace","tag-war"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80721","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=80721"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80721\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":80722,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80721\/revisions\/80722"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=80721"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=80721"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=80721"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}