{"id":81637,"date":"2021-03-01T23:00:21","date_gmt":"2021-03-01T15:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=181777"},"modified":"2021-03-01T23:00:21","modified_gmt":"2021-03-01T15:00:21","slug":"chinese-blockchain-firm-sos-denies-claims-by-short-sellers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/03\/01\/chinese-blockchain-firm-sos-denies-claims-by-short-sellers\/","title":{"rendered":"Chinese blockchain firm SOS denies claims by short-sellers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Chinese blockchain firm SOS denies claims by short-sellers 27 AM<\/p>\n<p>(Reuters) &#8211; Chinese blockchain firm SOS Ltd said on Monday that the claims against it by short-sellers Hindenburg Research and Culper Research were &#8220;distorted&#8221;, &#8220;misleading&#8221;, and &#8220;unsubstantiated&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Days after the two short-sellers took a short position on its stock, the company said social media accounts of some of its board members may have been impersonated or disabled for short periods of time.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chinese blockchain firm SOS denies claims by short-sellers 27 AM<br \/>\n(Reuters) &#8211; Chinese blockchain firm SOS Ltd said on Monday that the claims against it by short-sellers Hindenburg Research and Culper Research were \"distorted\", \"m&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[213,194,465],"tags":[7705,3472],"class_list":["post-81637","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china-news","category-news-chinese-law","category-social-media","tag-blockchain","tag-chinese"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81637","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=81637"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81637\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":81640,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81637\/revisions\/81640"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=81637"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=81637"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=81637"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}