{"id":82204,"date":"2021-03-04T22:59:46","date_gmt":"2021-03-04T14:59:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=183151"},"modified":"2021-03-04T22:59:46","modified_gmt":"2021-03-04T14:59:46","slug":"after-marathon-bail-hearings-hong-kong-pro-democracy-activists-find-themselves-back-in-detention","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/03\/04\/after-marathon-bail-hearings-hong-kong-pro-democracy-activists-find-themselves-back-in-detention\/","title":{"rendered":"After marathon bail hearings, Hong Kong pro-democracy activists find themselves back in detention"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>HONG KONG \u2014 After four days of hearings, dozens of weary pro-democracy activists charged with subversion under the national security law found themselves back where they started: in detention.In a case that has emerged as the clearest illustration yet of the pressures on Hong Kong\u2019s courts as Beijing cracks down on the territory, lawyers were unable to secure even temporary freedom for the 47 pro-democracy activists charged Sunday with conspiracy to commit subversion, which is punishable by up to life in prison.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>HONG KONG \u2014 After four days of hearings, dozens of weary pro-democracy activists charged with subversion under the national security law found themselves back where they started: in detention.In a case that has emerged as the clearest illustration yet &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,144,213,325,339,176,785,194,1108,1542,334],"tags":[10382,3472,10321,1696,10323,10338,10331,10389,2172,8864,10328,1816,10345,10385],"class_list":["post-82204","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beijing","category-china","category-china-news","category-education","category-hong-kong","category-human-rights","category-new-york","category-news-chinese-law","category-police","category-technology","category-university","tag-activist","tag-chinese","tag-communist","tag-congress","tag-coronavirus","tag-democracy","tag-elections","tag-lgbtq","tag-national-security","tag-news-media","tag-pandemic","tag-prison","tag-propaganda","tag-security-law"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82204","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=82204"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82204\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":82205,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82204\/revisions\/82205"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=82204"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=82204"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=82204"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}